Sexual Assault and Rape on College Campuses: A Psychological Critique of Failed Public Health Approaches to Reducing Assaults on Campus – Katie Muto
Introduction
On a typical
college campus in the United States, one in four women will experience a rape or
attempted rape during their college career (1). The majority of these cases are
acquaintance or date rape; 85% of women who experience sexual assault on campus
indicate that they knew their assailant, and alcohol is reportedly involved in
75-90% of acquaintance rapes (2). One of the most concerning statistics indicates
that between 25 and 50% of survivors seek treatment for depression, PTSD,
and/or other mental health issues (4). Despite the fact that survivors face
devastating consequences as a result of sexual assault, 81% of cases are not
reported to college authorities, and a striking 95% of these incidents are not
reported to the police (3).
Sexual
assault rates on campus highlight a public health epidemic in this country. In
order to improve sexual assault rates, it is essential to highlight the factors
that promote a culture of assault on college campuses. And yet, despite the
fact that the environment and culture of a college campus clearly plays an
important role in the issue, as evidenced by higher assault rates on college
campuses than the national average, promoting open, honest discourse on the
issue has proven difficult. The public perception of this issue is strongly
influenced by ideology and social constructs that make it difficult to change
behavior and attitude toward assaults. While the usual suspects-misogyny,
sexism, acceptance of rape culture- have helped shape our perception of campus
assaults, public health campaigns meant to reduce assaults on campus and
protect women against the “rape culture” have actually reinforced the very
ideologies that they meant to overcome. Until recently, the majority of public
health initiatives focused on primary prevention for women. These campaigns,
both national and campus-based, focused on teaching women how to avoid being a
victim of assault (1). Women are constantly reminded not to drink, wear
provocative clothing, or travel alone at night. The unintended consequence of
this type of campaign is that it suggests that women are responsible for instigating
an assault. Primary prevention campaigns unintentionally reinforce
“victim-blaming,” by implying that women are responsible for protecting
themselves (1-4). As a result, assault victims often feel that they were
responsible for the incident, and therefore don’t report assault to
authorities.
Recently, a
new public heath approach to campus assaults has gained significant traction.
The approach focuses on shifting target audience from women to men, thus
reframing the issue as a man’s problem, as opposed to a woman’s. One such
campaign, which originated online and was eventually used as a poster campaign
in various colleges across the United States, exemplifies this recent trend. The poster is simply a list titled: “Sexual
Assault Prevention Tips” (5). The list, which blatantly mocks previous
women-centric public health campaigns, shifts blame, placing it squarely on the
shoulders of men. Similar campaigns, including the “Don’t be That Guy” (6)
initiative, which originated in Canada and eventually trickled onto college
campuses in the United States, follow the same theoretical assumption that
targeting men would incentivize them to change their behavior. While this
approach was meant to improve upon previous campaigns by reframing the issue as
a man’s problem, the campaign fails to consider the consequences of painting
all men as potential rapists. In reality, this approach, based on the Transtheoretical
model of behavior, not only reinforces victim-blaming by causing strong
psychological reactance in male readers who immediately become defensive, but
it also unintentionally frames the issue as a battle of the sexes as opposed to
a serious public health problem that men and women need to address together.
Critique
1
The recent
men-centered poster campaigns assume that the Transtheoretical model can be
applied to men’s behavior. The transtheoretical, or “stages of change” model is
based on the concept that behavior is a process, not a single event or decision.
Individuals move through the five stages of the model, and thus interventions
can be targeted to each stage (7). The
stages of the model include pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation,
action, and maintenance. The “tips to avoid assault” and “Don’t Be That Guy”
campaigns assume that men follow the Transtheoretical model in relation to
sexual assault. The posters specifically
target men at the contemplation and preparation stage of the model in an
attempt to deter them from reaching the action stage, which, in this instance,
translates into performing an assault. The campaign assumes that most men intend
to rape or assault a woman, and/or have taken behavioral steps towards said
assault. The tips on one poster include
suggestions like “don’t put drugs in woman’s drink,” “don’t have sex with
someone while they are asleep…that’s rape,” and “just because she isn’t saying
no, doesn’t mean she’s saying yes.”(5,6). These suggestions clearly assume that men
reading the poster have contemplated assaulting an individual, and therefore
the poster serves to deter them from acting on the behavior by reminding them
that these actions are, in fact, rape. The campaigns not only paints men as
likely rapists, but also illuminate two major limitations to the Transtheoretical
model: the assumption of reasoned action, and the lack of consideration of
external and social/cultural influences (7). The campaigns assume that men’s
decisions are based on reasoned behavior, and that they contemplate their
actions before engaging in an assault.
While this may in fact be the case, this approach oversimplifies the
issue by grouping two distinct rape scenarios into one model. On the “How to
Avoid Sexual Assault” poster in particular, this oversimplification paints rape
in a stereotypical light: half the tips on the poster are directed towards
forcible, “stranger” rape, in which a woman is violently attacked and
threatened by a random individual. Based on campus statistics, however, this
scenario is the minority. The danger of tying the two scenarios into one
campaign is that men may view the poster as unfairly characterizing them as a
“rapist” in the stereotypical sense of the word. The limitations of this model
highlight an important dilemma for public health officials: many men (and some women)
view sexual assault on a spectrum, in which some assaults are considered
legitimate, and some, though legally defined as assault, are considered socially
acceptable or even normal. In fact, recent studies indicate that many men who
have performed one or more assaults don’t think of themselves as rapists (8). This
has far reaching impacts, as both men who’ve committed or will commit date
rape, and men who have not contemplated or considered assaulting a person at
all, react strongly and negatively to such campaigns, which they view as
unjustly accusatory. In this way, the
poster campaign inadvertently reinforces the stereotypical view of rape as a
violent and forcible act between “strangers,” and enables college assailants to
distinguish themselves from these “stereotypical” rapists. Thus the application
of the model reinforces the idea that date rape is not considered “legitimate rape.”
Critique
2
In
aggressively targeting men, the poster campaigns inspire strong psychological
reactance in men. Because the majority of assailants on a college campus engage
in assault behavior that does not include weapons, and oftentimes involves
coercion as opposed to overt violence (1-4), men are likely view the poster
campaign as both unjust and unfairly condescending. The campaign accentuates psychological
reactance because it threatens men’s perceived freedom (9). The campaigns
suggest that all men are potentially violent rapists and therefore, in painting
men as evil, the campaign implies that men should be behind bars. Similarly,
the condescending tone introduced in both campaigns paints men as brutish,
childish, and unable to control themselves. The campaign implies that men are
so irresponsible and immoral that they can’t be trusted to act reasonably or
rationally without the help of campus-wide posters to remind them how to behave
in civilized society. Men therefore perceive the campaign as a serious threat
to their own liberty. Because the perceived loss of freedom is so strong men
display negative reactance to the message. In fact, the reactance could be so powerful
that men seem to have experience the “boomerang effect”(9). While it seems
unlikely that aggressively trying to change men’s behavior and thus reducing
assaults on campus may actually result in men assaulting women at an increased
rate, consider the response to recent discourse on sexual assault. Men, and
even some women, have reacted incredibly powerfully to the suggestion that men
are responsible for the campus rape epidemic. In fact, some individuals have
gone so far as to actively deny any problem exists on college campuses, thus
reframing the issue as one of dishonesty and deception spearheaded by women, as
opposed to a legitimate public health problem (10-15). As a direct result of psychological
reactance, men not only reject the idea that they could possibly assault a
woman, but go so far as to delegitimize the entire issue, thus promoting an
environment in which women’s “false” claims of assault simply a means by which
women attempt to limit men’s freedom. Evidence of psychological response ranges
from men’s rights blogs demonizing feminist groups for creating “rape hysteria”
to potential senate candidates. Todd Aiken’s “legitimate rape” comments not
only highlights a disturbing perception of the issue, but also exemplifies psychological
reactance to the concept of assault (11). By delegitimizing the plight of women
on campus, men not only shift the focus from one of safety to one of men’s
rights, but simultaneously perpetuate a cultural ideology in which date rape is
a fake concept introduced by hysterical women, as opposed to a legitimate
crime.
Critique
3
By utilizing
the Transtheoretical model of behavior, thus inspiring strong psychological
reactance, men-centered campaigns unintentionally create two contrasting frames
through which men and women view the issue of assault on campus. For women, the
campaign is viewed through a safety/security frame, in which men are portrayed
as brutish, unfeeling attackers who need to be reminded constantly not to rape
(16). The imagery of the frame centers on the idea that men can’t help
themselves when placed in a situation in which rape is a possible outcome,
creates a metaphor of men as both incompetent children and as dangerous
predators. The frame doesn’t distinguish character, it simply portrays all men
as potential rapists who actively try to attack women’s sense of security. In
contrast, men are more likely to view the posters in a negative light and thus
create a frame that justifies this negative response. Instead of viewing sexual
assault as an issue of safety and security for women, men reframe the issue in
order to reduce cognitive dissonance between their view of self and the view
portrayed in the poster of men as evil rapists (17). A recent viral poster
campaign, created as a direct response to the “Tips to Avoid Sexual Assault,”
exemplifies how men resolve cognitive dissonance by reframing the issue. The
list of suggestions, titled “Top Tips to End False Rap Accusations,” implies
that the true issue is not one of women’s safety, but one of men’s freedom and
liberty from false rape accusations. Twenty years of research indicate that the
false rape accusation rate lies between 2-8%, which is consistent with false
allegations in every other crime. However, in this case, men’s groups
aggressively reframe the issue in order to justify their negative response to
rape campaigns and recuse themselves of alleged faults (19). In this freedom
frame, women threaten men’s liberty by unfairly and unjustly accusing them of
rape. This frame is incredibly strong, as the concept of false accusation
towards men not only metaphorically reduces men’s sense of freedom by promoting
fear and uncertainty around women, but, if accused, a man could literally be
stripped of his freedom and put in jail. Images and keywords associated with
this frame include women as liars and false accusers, women as power-crazed,
and women as “feminazis” who create a false rape culture in order to control
men. As long as men view sexual assault through this disturbing lens, it
becomes almost impossible to introduce effective discourse on the subject.
A recent
initiative by the Civil Liberties Union, which focused on enforcing equal
rights on campus through Title IV by providing more protections for women from
sexual assault, only strengthens this freedom frame. In an open letter titled
“Dear Colleague,” the office for civil rights reminded colleges that they were
responsible for enforcing protections for women. The letter instructed colleges to apply a
lower standard of proof in assault cases. Instead of requiring “clear and
convincing evidence” which is often difficult for victims to produce,
particularly if women do not immediately report to officials, colleges should
now apply “preponderance of evidence standard” meaning if committee can
discipline the alleged attacker if they believe with greater than 50% certainty
that the woman was assaulted (20). While this directive is essential for
ensuring that victims rights are protected, the outcry over male liberty was
aggressive and immediate. The directive only fueled the freedom frame by
further dividing men and women (21-23). Immediately, newspapers and blogs
across the country reacted by portraying the initiative as an unconstitutional
attack on male freedom. By reframing the directive as a direct assault on male
liberty, men effectively refocused the argument from that of a serious public
health and security issue for women to a freedom issue for men. In the process
of reframing the issue, men’s groups also resorted to delegitimizing women’s
group in the process, thus reducing women to the role of lying, manipulative,
dishonest feminists who actively accuse men of rape in order to gain power and
control by reducing men’s freedom. In doing so, men successfully recreate
themselves the victims instead of accusers.
Recommendations
Aggressive
campaigns that place blame for the sexual assault epidemic on men prove
ineffective because they inadvertently threaten perceived freedom, thus
inducing powerful psychological reactance. As a result of the strength of the
reaction, men seek to protect their liberty by delegitimizing assault along
with those individuals they perceive as threatening their freedom, namely women.
As men’s groups continue to reframe the issue as one of men’s rights, as
opposed to one of women’s safety and health, the divide between women and men
continues to deepen. The poster campaigns instigate conflict between women and
men, thus promoting a battle of the sexes. In reality, the campaign’s attempt
to promote discourse instead reinforces the concept of rape as “he said v. she
said” thus relegating the discussion to one of derisiveness and anger.
In
order to effectively reframe the highly emotional topic to better reach both
sexes, we must unify the issues of men’s and women’s rights. The three major
problems with the recent men-centered approaches to college assault—namely the
ineffective use of Transtheoretical model, the induction of psychological
reactance in men, and the ability for men to easily reframe the issue to one of
freedom—must be resolved in order to improve the discourse about sexual assault
on college campuses.
Recommendation
1
The Transtheoretical
model neglects to take into account the social factors that influence
behavior. Instead, application of the
Social Learning, or Social Cognitive Model would more effectively allow public
health experts to make positive changes on campus. Unlike the Transtheoretical Model, Social
Cognition Model takes into account the dynamic interaction of person, behavior,
and environment. On the college campus, observation and learning through social
interactions enables modeling. Younger individuals model the behaviors of other
people on the campus (7). Women often observe other women drinking heavily,
going to large parties, and often going home with men (1-4). Younger
individuals model this behavior, and the attention women get from their male
counterparts reinforces the behavior. Similarly, men observe their fellow male
classmates drinking heavily and actively pursuing women, often discussing their
sexual exploits publicly with friends or teammates afterwards, thus reinforcing
the behavior. In both cases, men and women consistently justify questionable
sexual behavior with the excuse of alcohol (24). Again, this type of behavior is reinforced in
the campus setting, in which heavy drinking is considered not only acceptable
but normal and even expected. At the same time, the reluctance to talk about
sexual assault issues, coupled with the common use of alcohol as an excuse for
often criminal behavior, promotes an environment in which men have the ability
to both coerce women under the guise of “being drunk and stupid.” In this case,
the environment plays an especially important role in permitting/deterring
assault. Changing the environment could help shift the perception of sexual
assault as normal or accepted within the context of the college campus. Using Social
Cognitive Theory, we can focus public health efforts on changing the college
environment in a way that promotes similar changes to attitude and ideally behavior.
In order to design
a campaign that promotes environmental and attitude changes, it is essential to
understand the factor in the college environment that promotes rape culture. Twenty
years of research indicates that alcohol and the “party” culture on college
campuses plays a significant and even central role in upwards of 75% of assault
cases (25). Alcohol undermines an individual’s ability to refuse sexual
advances, while also reducing the victim’s likelihood of reporting assault due
to their inability to remember the event clearly (25). Despite the fact that alcohol is illegal for
those under 21, the college environment seems to act above this law. In fact,
both through media and social reinforcement, alcohol and binge drinking have
become ingrained in college culture (25-28). Alcohol is the number one date
rape drug in the country. Why then, in light of extensive information about the
relationship between alcohol and assault, do most colleges openly flaunt this
unhealthy drinking culture? Fraternities, tailgates at college games, even the
weeklong booze-filled “senior week,” all hosted by the college, point to a
significant conflict of interest between college administrators and their
students. College administrations recognize that if the college experience is
considered “fun,” alumni are more likely to donate to the school, and they are
more likely to attract young teens seeking the “typical” college experience. To
this end, colleges have voiced concern about implementing severe penalties for
underage drinking, claiming such stringent rules would significantly reduce the
appeal of the school, thus hurting the college’s reputation and reduce alumni donations
(25). The takeaway is simple: Colleges care more about maintaining reputation
and collecting money than they do about the security and wellbeing of their
student body. This theme will be the basis of our new public health
campaign.
Recommendation
2
Recent
assault campaigns failed because they instigated animosity between men and
women; therefore, shifting blame away from college students and placing it on a
third party allows public health campaigns to reframe the issue as one of
security and/or freedom from the administration. In this case, irresponsible
and immoral college administrators represent the third party, or common enemy. Frames for this campaign will focus on the
fact that both men and women, forced into a college culture of alcoholism and
abuse, are stripped of their most basic rights to freedom and safety. Images
and metaphors would develop from the following positions: women are at risk of
being assaulted and then silenced, thus loosing the rights to security, free
speech, and freedom from a life of mental instability and PTSD; men are at risk
of being falsely accused of assault and quite literally stripped of their civil
liberties and thrown in jail (27).
Recommendation
3
Because
assault is such an emotionally charged issue, the risk of psychological
reactance is high. To mitigate the negative effects of reactance, we must
create a campaign that students view as familiar, reasonable, and similar to
their own view and values. Therefore any new campaign targeting administrators
should utilize themes and styles that are easily recognizable and enjoyable to
college students. Memes, popular internet characters or themes on which individuals
can write text to express their perception of an issue or call to light a
hypocrisy or entertaining anecdote, could prove to be highly effective both as
a poster campaign on campuses and as a viral campaign. One such meme, the
“scumbag” meme, has gained significant popularity and would be easily
recognizable to most college students. Utilizing this meme to express concern
with the hypocrisy of the college administration could prove to be highly
effective in the context of our frames.
For example,
posers would simply include a picture of a stuffy older man in a suit sitting
in a dark, intimidating office. The picture would never change but the text
could be changed to convey different “scumbag administrator” examples. The
first might read: “sponsors the tailgate party where you got in trouble, claims
he can’t afford a lawyer for you.” This
one can be directed towards both men and women, as each side would assume that
they deserve to have access to a fair and thorough trial or hearing. Another poster conveys the hypocrisy and false
security assurances from the college: “Tells you alcohol is a date rape drug….
provides free alcohol for the entire campus four times a week.” In addition to
creating images that can translate between men and women, the very same image
can target each gender specifically. For women, these posters could read, “
pays for a campus-wide party to raise awareness about assault … the theme: sexist
bro’s and drunken ho’s.” This campaign can be especially effective because it
is simple, easily recognizable, and it doesn’t have to simply come from one
source. Ideally, students from all over the country could create their own
version of the “scumbag” administrator meme. In fact, by creating a campaign
which college students can contribute to, it is possible that this would
further mitigate psychological reactance, as the message is not necessarily
coming from a public health organization, but may be written by a classmate,
friend, or colleague. The sense of otherness focuses itself entirely on the
“scumbag administrator.” Ideally, contributing to or reading these simple memes
could inspire a new perspective on formerly accepted campus culture norms.
This
recommendation addresses three problems faced by the men-centered public health
campaigns. By recognizing that environment plays a central role in attitudes
and behaviors, we sought to determine what environmental changes would likely
influence the strongest shifts in attitude and behavior. Because previous
campaigns didn’t focus specifically on the environment of the campus, their
campaign goals were more driven towards changing behavior, which proves
especially difficult with a topic that is so emotionally charged. While the
men-centered campaigns caused significant backlash from males because they
threatened perceived freedoms, thus instigating an angry and powerful
psychological response, we mitigate this reactance by shifting blame from men
to administrators. In addition, to ensure that our own campaign didn’t induce a
negative response, we utilized familiar and well-known memes that students
would view positively. Finally, because men framed the issue as one of men’s
rights, thus pitting them against women’s groups and sexual assault prevention
groups, our campaign seeks to reframe the issue as one of students vs.
administrators. In doing so, men feel less persecuted and therefore don’t
respond aggressively to discourse on assault. In addition, placing
responsibility on administrators similarly forward our goal of reducing consumption
on campus by singling out negligent leadership on campus. By reframing the
administrator as the number one provider of date rape drugs on campus, our
campaign effectively targets campus who, until know, have refused to take
responsibility for their own students. With this campaign, college
administrators become the attacker, and the only way to rid themselves of the
image is to finally take the necessary steps to severely curb campus alcohol
abuse, and therefore reduce sexual assaults on the campus.
REFERENCES
2.
Christopher P. Krebs, C.P Lindquist, C.H, Warner. T.D.,
Bonnie S. Fisher, B.S., Martin, S.L. The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study.
Final Report NIH Grant# 2004-WG-BX-0010. Washington, DC:US Department of
Justice
3.
Fisher, B.S., Cullen, F.T., & Turner, M.G. (2000). The
sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Justice.
4.
Miller,
T, Cohen, M.A. and Wierama b.. Victim
costs and consequences: A new look. 1996. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department. of Justice, National Institute of Justice. Available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/155282.htm.
5.
Tips to Avoid Sexual Assault. Digital image. Tumblin Feminist. Tumblr.com, n.d.
Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
6.
"Don't
Be That Guy." The Violence
Stops Here. Battered Women's Support Services, n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
7.
National
Cancer Institute. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice.
Part 2. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2005, pp. 9-21 (NIH
Publication No. 05-3896). Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/PDF/481f5d53-63df-41bc-bfaf-5aa48ee1da4d/TAAG3.pdf.
8.
Shapiro,
Joseph. "Myths That Make It Hard To Stop Campus Rape." NPR. NPR, 04 Mar. 2010. Web. 13 Dec.
2012.
9.
Silvia PJ.
Deflecting reactance: The role of similarity in increasing compliance and
reducing resistance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2005; 27:277-284.
10.
Kaminer,
Wendy. "Sexual Harassment and the Loneliness of the Civil Libertarian
Feminist." The Atlantic.
N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
11.
Black, Jeff.
"Rape Remarks Sink Two Republican Senate Hopefuls." NBC Politics. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec.
2012.
12.
"Community of
the Wrongly Accused." Web log post. Community of the Wrongly Accused. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
13.
Kaminer, Wendy.
"Sexual Harassment and the Loneliness of the Civil Libertarian
Feminist." The Atlantic.
N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
14.
Price, P. R.
"Montana Forces Feminist Rape Propaganda on Students." The Spearhead RSS. N.p., 29 Aug.
2012. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
15.
"The Scourge of
Rape. Yeah, Whatever." A
Voice for Men. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
16.
Menashe CL,
Siegel M. The power of a frame: an analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco
issues – United States, 1985—1996. Journal
of Health Communication 1998; 3(4):307-325.
17.
"Cognitive
Dissonance Theory." Wikipedia.
Wikimedia Foundation, 12 Nov. 2012. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
18.
Top Ten Tips to Avoid False Rape Accusations. Digital image.Http://i.imgur.com/ojeN7.jpg. Web. 13
Dec. 2012.
19.
Irvine,
Mahri. "Myth Busting: False Rape Reports ." American Way of Life Magazine. N.p.,
05 Apr. 2010. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
20.
Ali, Russlyn “Dear
Colleague Letter: Sexual Violence” Office of Civil Rights. Department of
Education. 24 April 2011
21.
"Title
IX and the University’s New Policy: Is This Really Just?" The GW Patriot. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
22.
Bader,
Hans. Education Dept Unlawfully
Changes Burden of Proof in College Sexual Harassment Cases.. Web. 13
Dec. 2012.
23.
Berkowitz,
Peter. "College Rape Accusations and the Presumption of Male
Guilt." Wall Street Journal.
News Corp., 20 Aug. 2011. Web.
24.
Abbey, A. Zawacki,
T., Buck, P.O. Clinton, A.M, McAuslan, P. Alcohol and Sexual Assault” (2001).
Alcohol Research and Health. 25:1 43-51.
25.
Pacific Institute of
Research and Evaluation. Environmental Strategies to Prevent Alcohol Problems
on Campuses. Submitted to Department of Justice. April 2000.
26.
Selman,
Pam. “Alcohol Culture Fosters Sexual Assault Environment on Campus." The Badger Herald. UW-Madison, n.d.
Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
27.
Ullman S.E.,
Karabatsos G. Koss M.P. Alcohol and Sexual Assault in a National Sample of
College Women. (1999)Journal of Interpersonal Violence.14:6. 603-625
28.
Armstrong E.A.
Hamilton L., Sweeney, B. Sexual Assault on Campus: A Multilevel, Integrative
Approach to Party Rape. (2006) Social Problems. 53:4. 483-499.
29.
Certain
Trumpet Program. Framing Memo: The
Affirmative Action Debate. Washington, DC: Advocacy Institute, September
1996.
30.
Winett L.
Advocates guide to developing framing memos (Chapter 46). In: Iyengar S, Reeves
R, eds. Do the Media Govern?
Politicians, Voters and Reporters in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Publications, Inc., 1997, pp.420-432.
Labels: Pink, Sexual and Reproductive Health, Sexual Violence, Women's Health
1 Comments:
Thanks for sharing your thesis, Amanda. It can be a good tool to spread awareness on how to keep sexual assault from inflating on the campuses. The cases can happen anytime, anywhere, and to anyone, however, it can also be an eye-opener.
Vesta @Zalkin.com
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home