Reframing a Hot Issue on Campus: Boston University Men’s Ice Hockey Team Members’ Sexual Assault Allegation – Jessie Lee
Back in December of
2011 and February of 2012, two Boston University men’s ice hockey team members were
accused of sexual assaults against female students on campus. Both players were
kicked off the university ice hockey team, though one player eventually had
those charges dismissed (1). After the allegations, a task
force was put together in March by Dr. Robert A. Brown, President of Boston
University, to investigate the incidents and provide recommendations based on its
assessment.
The president
issued several statements of intent at the time of forming the task force that
consisted of university trustees, overseers, faculty, and staff. After six
months, the final report with fourteen recommendations appeared on the
university website and in Bostonia magazine.
These documents have also been cited in a number of major media for a long time.
In this paper, I
would like to analyze how the university staff and the task force have misleadingly approached the sexual assault on campus and suggest an alternative
approach that would better address the kernel of the problem.
Current
Approach’s Flaw 1: The Issue Is Framed as “Within Ice Hockey Team
Culture.”
As clearly stated
in the letters, the purpose of the Task Force on Men’s Hockey was to “examine
the culture of our men’s ice hockey team” (2) and to answer “questions about
whether the hockey team's culture and climate have contributed in some way to
the actions of the two individuals (3).” The charges
of sexual assault by two athletes are being attributed to the culture and
climate within the ice hockey team.
Also, in the
final report, the task force concluded that the unique culture of men’s ice
hockey, its preeminent status on campus, contributed to “a celebrity culture.”
The president believed that this situation was exacerbated in the team where
professional teams frequently draft players before entering college and that this
elevated status could have led to the unacceptable behavior (4).
The celebrity culture, in turn, led to
“a culture of sexual entitlement” that exists among some players on the men's
ice hockey team. According to the report, “This culture of sexual entitlement,
as evidenced by frequent sexual encounters with women absent an emotional
relationship or on-going commitment, can also involve unprotected sex. This
culture is actively supported by a small subset of BU's undergraduate
population (5).”
The task force also concluded that there existed significant
deficiencies in the structures and processes, which could not achieve the
quality of oversight of the men's ice hockey program that was expected and
appropriate at a major university, including shortcomings in institutional
control and leadership at the team level (5). This conclusion is another attempt to
limit the issue to some drawbacks of the men’s ice hockey team.
As shown in a number of studies, sexual assault experienced by the weak, especially female students on
campus, is becoming a more serious problem across the university campuses. It
is never confined to athlete groups. One in four college-aged women report rape
or attempted rape, and one in five college women are raped during their college
years (6). Another study showed that since enrolling in college, 27% of women
had experienced unwanted sexual contact ranging from kissing and petting to
oral, anal, or vaginal intercourse. Moreover, more than one third of these
victims reported multiple forced sexual experiences (7).
To make the matters worse, 81% of on-campus and 84% of
off-campus sexual assaults are not reported to the police, and fewer than 5% of
rapes are reported to law enforcement (6).
Framing Theory
is based on the assumption that how an issue is characterized in news reports
can have an influence on how it is understood by audiences (8). In
greater numbers than ever before, people in society get information overload, specifically about any person or
situation they have not personally experienced, from the media, especially the
news. The news may be the most accessible site for public conversation, the
place where policy issues are debated and framed.
Frames operate
inside our brains to organize and interpret the cues we get from the world. Lakoff argues
that frames are the conceptual bases for understanding anything. People are
only able to interpret words, images, or actions that their brains fit into an
existing conceptual system that gives them order and meaning. Just a word or an
image can trigger whole frames that inspire certain interpretations in
audiences (9).
Since the “Within ice hockey team culture” frame has been well accepted and supported throughout
the community, it did not seem hard to blame and punish the individual who was
in charge of the men’s ice hockey team. According to Iyengar, when people watch
news stories that lack full context, they focus on the individuals. Without any
other information, they tend to attribute responsibility to the people portrayed in the story for
the problem and its solution. In other words, they blame the victim (9).
Although it
turned out to be true that the coach of the men’s ice hockey team failed to
take sexual assault as seriously as he needed to (10),
he might not be the one who is primarily responsible for the incidents because
it seemed impossible for him to control the behavior of
his players off the ice. The president attempted to comfort him by admitting
that the university has not done enough to support structures for the
elite-level student-athletes and coaching staff (11).
Still, the men’s ice hockey coach has stepped down as Executive Director of
Athletics.
Based on the
approach described above, the task force made suggestions that included improvement
of the oversight structure and a mentoring program of peers and alumni for the men’s
ice hockey players (12).
Without a sense
of the forces that brought the people in the story to this point, viewers are likely to
distance themselves from the “victims” portrayed in the story, assuming that they brought the problem on
themselves, looking to them to work harder to solve their own problem or to accept the consequences
of their behavior. Watching episodic
stories, viewers gain no insight into the larger social and political
circumstances that contribute
to the individual problem (9).
How to view an
issue may determine how to think and act about it.
Those who have encouncered the news that dominantly uses frames the task force has
come up with, especially the broader student population, are likely not to
be much concerned and ignore their responsibility to be enlightened about the issue and change the norms on campus.
The 16-member
task force was all comprised of professionals
from various fields, including faculty and staff members, trustees, and
overseers. Without university students’ direct involvement in the task force, which
aimed to investigate the incidents occurring on campus, the assessment seemed
superficial and imperfect. Some unnamed students told CBS Boston that they did
not necessarily see the ice hockey players as entitled or elevated in their
social status (13).
Current
Approach’s Flaw 2: The Issue Is Put in the Context of Alcohol-Induced Incidents.
One of the two
players charged with sexual assault allegedly had a history of alcohol-related
problems (14). The coach of
the men’s ice hockey team said, "There is no question in my mind it's an
alcohol problem (15)." Also, in
an interview with one of daily newspapers, he stated that sexual assault this
player committed was the fourth alcohol-related incident for which the player
had been punished, and then insisted that he had tried his best to punish and
warn the player to be more responsible about drinking. Since the player was also victim of alcohol problems, the coach felt
sorry for the loss of one of the well-liked and outstanding players that left a
consequent hole in the team’s soul (14).
He put this
assault in the context of other alcohol-related incidents that had the player
on team probation and then framed it as just another example of problematic
drinking behavior. If he was an alcoholic, he may have behaved out of control.
However, not every alcoholic assaults women. By dismissing assault as something
men do when they are drunk, the significance and seriousness of the issue is
minimized.
Also, in the final
report of the task force with the description of the late night party at the
hockey arena after the team won the 2009 national championship, the university
president blamed a cocktail of beer and success. According to the report,
“substance abuse, including heavy alcohol use in particular, can be an
important part of students’ social and sexual culture (16).”
He also articulated in another statement that excessive alcohol consumption has
played a role in the majority of the instances of alleged sexual assault that
has been identified through the work of the task force (17).
Based on these
assessments, the task force made recommendations with regard to how to
implement a comprehensive, campus-wide program that would aim at moderating university
students’ alcohol use (4). The suggestions included that
the university should establish an office that offers a comprehensive alcohol
and drug prevention program and that the current rules of the ice hockey team
need to be updated to include polices related to sexual violence and alcohol
use (12).
By lumping alcohol and sexual violence together, they have made the very
guts of a matter unclear. As some studies show that alcohol consumption is
associated with sexual victimization, partly because sexual predators are more
likely to target women who have been drinking, alcohol
consumption could be a reinforcing factor in behaving in uncontrollable ways (18). However, it should be noted that drinking should
not be equaled to or used as an excuse for sexual assault.
Ecological approaches are consistent in identifying
gender-based, discriminatory attitudes and unequal power structures as pivotal
in the continuation of violence against women and sexual assault and also as
significant points for primary prevention (19). Sexual
assaults are not motivated by an uncontrollable impulsive sexual urge. Also,
sexual offenders come from all educational, occupational, and cultural backgrounds. They
are ordinary, not mentally ill or abnormal, individuals “who sexually assault
victims to assert power and control over them and inflict violence, humiliation
and degradation (20).”
Current
Approach’s Flaw 3: Recommendations Made Are Misleadingly Linked to Improving
Academic Performance of Men’s Ice Hockey Team Members.
The initial charges
the task force took on included examining student-athletes’ academic quality
and their chosen fields of study, their life issues and interactions with the
broader university community, and their disciplinary history compared with
those of “average” undergraduate students. According to the report, these
criteria were justifiable since “the Boston University community expects
that our student-athletes, as representatives of the University, will adhere to
the same high standards to which we hold all members of our community and which
reflect the mission and aspirations of our university (2).”
As also implied in the
term “celebrity culture” mentioned earlier, the members of
the men’s ice hockey team were too segregated from other college athletes, the larger
undergraduate population, and the rest of campus, especially due to their
housing arrangements, exclusive training, and the high demands of team
participation, which have, in turn, led to the
undesirable behavior, including sexual abuse (21).
Accordingly, the report repeatedly emphasized the segregation of the men’s ice
hockey team from the rest of the community and the
necessity to take steps to address this separation.
In addition, the
task force concluded that even though there were no clear systemic problems found
with the ice hockey program, as evidenced by the fact that team members’ recent
disciplinary history did not reveal any pattern of infractions that was
significantly different, in type or number, from the undergraduate population as
a whole, athletes often had grades and entrance test scores below the general
student population (22).
The
report noted that nearly a third of the ice hockey team membes are already
committed to a National Hockey League team for future play, a phenomenon which
significantly contributes to an environment in which players may not be fully
engaged in the academic and extra-curricular activities that are routine for
the general student population (23).
This comment only restates that those unfortunate sexual assaults have
occurred inside the ice hockey team and thus make general university members
innocent in the matter.
Based on these
findings, the task force finally recommended developing a plan to ensure that all
student-athletes including ice hockey players are fully integrated into “student
life,” with particular emphasis on housing arrangements and participation in the
community (12).
Taking a close
look at how the statements made by the task force framed the ice hockey players
and their life, it seems as though they are “non-average” or “not integrated
into student life.” Those statements might also be misleading that sexual
violence committed by the ice hockey players is attributed to their poor academic
performance and maladjustment to the community.
Due to these conclusions, ice hockey team members, as a whole, are at
higher risk of being stigmatized. Stafford and Scott defined stigma as “a
characteristic of persons that is contrary to a norm of a social unit,”
where a norm is defined as a “shared belief
that a person ought to behave in a certain way at a certain time.”
Also, another influential definition of stigma is a “mark”
(i.e., attribute) that links a person to undesirable
characteristics (i.e., stereotypes) (24). According to the university’s
perspective, it is likely that playing ice hockey on the Boston University
men’s ice hockey team links student-athletes to undesirable characteristics
such as misconduct or poor “academic performance” in school.
There certainly exist various kinds of lifestyles and individuals, not only on campus but also in society. Achieving excellent performance in school does not necessarily mean
getting high test scores. Furthermore, sexual violence seems to have nothing to
do with whether offenders are
highly educated or excel in their studies. As described
under Flaw 2 section, sexual violence is, like other forms of violence, a consequence
of power difference between an offender and a victim.
New
Approach: Campus Sexual Assault Prevention Seminar (CSAPS) at Boston University
As one way to address sexual assault problem on
campus, Boston University will support and provide sexual assault prevention seminars
to its students in active collaboration with The Center for Gender, Sexuality
and Activism (CGSA). CGSA is a student-led organization on campus that aims to
end gender oppression and violence, and advocates for the full equality and
inclusion of women, queers and transgender students (25).
Instead of only targeting the men’s ice hockey team
members and stigmatizing them, this seminar will be a requirement for all
undergraduate students. Without didactic presentations that would likely invoke
psychological reactance, students will rather be broken down into small groups
and have moderated discussions with their peers as to definitions, causes, and
examples of sexual violence/assault/rape over several sessions. Moderators will
also be students who will be trained by CGSA. Then, students will write a final
paper addressing practices they should adopt or change to end sexual assaults
on campus. Additionally, more in-depth discussion about supportive theories or
support groups designed to share personal experiences will be held for students
who are willing to participate.
New
Approach Addressing Flaw 1: CSAPS Will Target All Undergraduate Students at Boston University.
In their final
report, the task force admitted to the fact that the absence of systematic
processes for sexual assault prevention training for the members of the men’s
ice hockey team, and university students more broadly, contributed to behaviors
that place many students at risk (11).
Nevertheless, the importance of the said problem seemed
overlooked due to the dominant “within ice hockey team
culture” frame.
Berkowitz and
others point to the importance of social and community norms as a significant
cause of sexual violence. Social Norms
Theory states that much of people’s behavior is
influenced by the perception of the extent that they believe others in their
immediate environment would support them and share their concerns (26). In other words, if unhealthy behavior is perceived to be the standard in a social group,
the social urge to conform will negatively affect overall behavior of group
members. Alternatively, by educating a group about healthy behavior that is in
fact the usual practice among their peers, the behavior of the group can be
affected in a positive manner (27). Peer influences
are considered to be a particularly important factor in enabling behavior change of individuals.
Sexual assault is a very sensitive, tough issue to talk about. However,
students are expected to have greater chance of changing their norms and
behaviors when they frequently have open, honest conversations about this issue
with their peers. This is also essential to overcome a taboo about talking about
sexual issues and remove stigmatization of sexual victims.
New
Approach Addressing Flaw 2: CSAPS Will Focus on the Root Cause of Sexual Assault.
While focusing on sexual assault, CSAPS
would address that alcohol and other drug abuse can be risk factors in that
they likely induce more violent behavior. However, it should be stressed that
the cause of action is different between sexual assault and alcohol abuse. The
former is caused by power difference between people, and the latter is by addiction.
Alcohol and other drug abuse prevention training should also be provided, but in
a different setting.
Once successfully implemented, CSAPS will make
the university’s rigorous efforts to address sexual assault on campus dominant
on the university media’s agenda and public press outlets. Agenda Setting Theory refers to the idea that there is a strong
correlation between the emphasis that media place on certain issues and the
importance attributed to these issues by mass audiences (28). The theory has explanatory,
predictive power because it predicts that if people are exposed to the same
media, they will feel the same issues are important (29). Members are limited by the amount of "surplus
compassion" they can muster for causes beyond the usual, immediate
concerns of their social status. In the same vein, the number of social problems is determined, not by the
number of serious situations and conditions facing society, but by the carrying
capacities of public institutions (30).
When publicized broadly, it is expected that other universities would
follow these efforts and support adoption of the program on their campus. That
way, social norms among university students can be changed positively.
New
Approach Addressing Flaw 3: CSAPS Will Emphasize That Sexual Assault Involves Everyone on Campus.
In Social
Cognitive Theory,
sociostructural factors operate through psychological mechanisms of the self-system
to produce behavioral effects. Thus, socioeconomic status and educational and
family structures affect behavior largely through their impact on people’s
aspirations, sense of efficacy, and other self-regulatory influences. (31) School setting may be an ideal channel to deliver tailored health
messages and target peer norms. Of the factors that would bring about behavior
change, perceived self-efficacy plays a critical role because efficacy beliefs
affect adaptation and change not only on their own, but also through their
impact on other determinants. Such beliefs influence whether people think in
ways that are self-enhancing or self-hindering. (31)
Within this conceptual framework,
personal factors in the form of moral thought, moral conduct, and environmental
factors all operate as interacting determinants that influence each other
bidirectionally. (32) By promoting self-efficacy throughout the
seminar sessions, students will be able to
demonstrate knowledge and beliefs with
regard to what constitutes sexual assault, the
significance of current norms
to let sexual violence persistent on
campus, and actions to take when they are sexually assaulted or see others
engage in unallowable behavior. Students
will also be expected to learn that they need not to silence their voice in a
matter of sexual assault involving themselves or others and that there are many
resources and professional service providers available on campus.
Changed behaviors and norms can also
influence campus environment towards anti-sexual violence. To put it concretely,
a suggestion, development, and change of policy or regulations as to sexual
assault, violence, and safety will be more supported by the university and its
members.
Conclusions
Even though the sexual assault
allegation that appeared on a number of media involved two men’s ice hockey
team members, sexual assault is a very common phenomenon on university campus. Nevertheless,
the task force to investigate this problem misleadingly framed it as a part of
the hockey team culture, one of alcohol-related problems, and a matter caused
due to segregation from the community. On the other hand, Campus Sexual Assault
Prevention Seminar (CSAPS) can overcome these flaws. The seminar will target
entire undergraduate population, address the root cause of sexual assault, and
increase self-efficacy of all students to change the norms on campus.
Refrences
(1) North A. Two assault charges makes BU’s hockey
team look pretty bad. Jezebel. February 20,
2012. http://jezebel.com/5886537/two-assault-charges-makes-bus-hockey-team-look-pretty-bad.
(2) Brown
R. Men’s ice hockey task force. Boston University Office of the President.
March 7, 2012. http://www.bu.edu/president/letters-writings/letters/2012/3-07/.
(3) Brown
R. Men’s ice hockey task force. Boston University Office of the President.
February 23, 2012. http://www.bu.edu/president/letters-writings/letters/2012/2-23/.
(4) Brown
R. Letter announcing findings of men’s ice hockey task force. Boston University
Office of the President. September 5, 2012. http://www.bu.edu/president/letters-writings/letters/2012/9-05/.
(5) Kalaf
S. BU men’s hockey team will try to change its “culture of sexual entitlement”.
Deadspin. September 5, 2012. http://deadspin.com/5940735/bu-mens-hockey-team-will-try-to-change-its-culture-of-sexual-entitlement.
(6) New
York University Student Health Center. National statistics about sexual
violence on college campuses. New York City, NY: New York University. http://www.nyu.edu/shc/promotion/svstat.html.
(7) Gross
AM, et al. An examination of sexual violence against college women. Violence Against
Women 2006; 12:288-300.
(8)
Scheufele DA, Tewkskbury D. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media
effects Models. Journal of Communication 2007;57:9–20.
(9) Dorfman
L, Wallack L, Woodruff K. More than a Message: Framing public health advocacy to
change corporate practices. Health Education & Behavior 2005;32(3):320-336.
(10) North A. Two assault charges makes BU’s hockey
team look pretty bad. Jezebel February 20, 2012.
http://jezebel.com/5886537/two-assault-charges-makes-bus-hockey-team-look-pretty-bad.
(11) Jahnke
A. Hockey task force finds oversight deficiencies, culture of entitlement. BU
today. September 5, 2012. http://www.bu.edu/today/2012/hockey-task-force-finds-oversight-deficiencies-culture-of-entitlement/.
(12) Brown
R. Report of the men’s ice hockey task force. Boston University Office of the
President. August 28, 2012. http://www.bu.edu/president/reports/hockey-task-force/.
(13) Kingkade
T. Boston University hockey team has 'culture of sexual entitlement' says
President Robert A. Brown's report. The hoffington post. September 6, 2012. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/06/boston-university-hockey-team-report_n_1861007.html?utm_hp_ref=college.
(14) Aronson
A, Healey T. Parker: Trivino’s actions leave ‘no question in my mind it’s an
alcohol problem’. The Daily Free Press. December 13, 2011.
http://dailyfreepress.com/2011/12/13/parker-trivinos-actions-leave-no-question-in-my-mind-its-an-alcohol-problem/.
(15) North A. Two assault charges makes BU’s hockey
team look pretty bad. Jezebel. February 20,
2012. http://jezebel.com/5886537/two-assault-charges-makes-bus-hockey-team-look-pretty-bad.
(16) McGuinness
W. Boston University Hockey Team Sex Assault Details Released, Coach Jack
Harper Loses Title In Fall-Out. The huffington post. September 7, 2012.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/07/boston-university-hockey-team-sex-scandal_n_1866042.html.
(17) Kingkade T. Boston University
hockey team has 'culture of sexual entitlement' says President Robert A.
Brown's report. The hoffington post. September 6, 2012. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/06/boston-university-hockey-team-report_n_1861007.html?utm_hp_ref=college.
(18) Gross AM, et al. An examination of
sexual violence against college women. Violence Against Women 2006; 12:288-300.
(19)
Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault. Conceptualising
the prevention of sexual assault and the role of education. Australia:
Australian Institute of Family Studies. http://www.aifs.gov.au/acssa/pubs/issue/i10.html.
(20) Connecticut
Sexual Assault Crisis Services, Inc. Myths&facts. East Hartford, CT: Connecticut Sexual Assault Crisis
Services, Inc. http://www.connsacs.org/learn/index.htm.
(21) CHN
Staff Report. Outlines 14 recommendations, but finds no 'clear systemic
issues'. College Hockey News. September 5, 2012. http://www.collegehockeynews.com/news/2012/09/05_bu_task_force_concludes_report.php.
(22) Zaremba J, Dwinell J. Panel hits ‘culture of sexual
entitlement’ at BU hockey. Boston Herald. September 5, 2012. http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1061158161&srvc=rss.
(23) Jahnke A. Hockey task force finds oversight deficiencies, culture of
entitlement. BU today. September 5, 2012. http://www.bu.edu/today/2012/hockey-task-force-finds-oversight-deficiencies-culture-of-entitlement/.
(24) Link
BG, Phelan JC. On stigma and its public health implications. Stigma Conference. http://www.stigmaconference.nih.gov/FinalLinkPaper.html.
(25) Center
for Gender, Sexuality & Activism, Mission and core values. Boston, MA:
Boston University. http://www.bu.edu/cgsa/about-us/mission-and-core-values/.
(26) Gidycz
CA, Orchowski LM, Berkowitz AD. Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and
bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women. 2011;17(6):720–742
(27) Wisconsin
Clearinghouse for Prevention Resources. Best practices social norms. Madison,
WI: University of Wisconsion-Madison. http://wch.uhs.wisc.edu/13-Eval/Tools/Resources/Social%20Norms.pdf.
(28) Scheufele DA, Tewkskbury D.
Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects Models. Journal
of Communication 2007;57:9–20.
(29) McCombs M, Shaw
DL. The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public
Opinion Quarterly, 1972;36:176-185.
(30) The rise and fall of social problems:
A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology 1988;94(1):53-78.
(31) Bandura
A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.
Annual Reviews of Psychology 2001; 52:1–26.
(32) Bandura
A. Social cognitive theory
of moral thought and action (pp.
45-103). In: Kurtines WM, Gewirtz JL, ed.
Handbook of moral behavior
and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991.
Labels: Cultural Issues, Platinum, Sexual Violence
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home